I'm saying, In all cases, that interpretation may be subjective, yet it is more or less accurate, and that accuracy is based on objective traits of the text. There's no perfect accuracy because there's no perfect objectivity, but you can argue about the accuracy of one's interpretation based on concrete aspects of the text.

Context plays a lot in terms of why an interpretation of racist meaning is present in the text, but I only hold the writer responsible for that if their context is similar enough to the one the interpretation comes from.

Is that more clear?