Entry tags:
Gendered fandoms
While browsing, today, I happened onto a link to this essay on Why do fanboys hate fanfics, especially slash and This is Our Garden. We Like It.. The article fits in a context of several commentaries a few weeks ago about the exclusion of the female experience of fandom by the majorly male fandom - some of which I saw at the time, some of which I missed.
cupidsbow's essay How Fanfictions makes us Poor which I already linked to was part of it too, I think.
Anyway, there's a lot of stuff on these discussions that made me angry as a woman against the systemicized sexism in fandom... but there's also something about the issue of gendered fandoms that really upsets me.
I've spent a majority of my "fandom life" within male dominated fandoms - first generalist Science Fiction newsgroup then Roleplaying Games clubs and forums. The kind of places where women make about 10 to 20% at most of the overall population. I've had to suffer to a lot of sexism, outright misogyny and sexual teasing. I went along with it because I wanted into the fandom and I didn't know anywhere else to get it and also because I'd been ostracized and bullied enough previously that the attention as the token girl and object of sexist and sexual jokes seemed actually an improvement.
Later on, I found some previously more mixed fandoms. ASOIAF has got, I think, about 40% of women at Ran's board. The part of Buffy's fandom I frequented, Masq's awesome ATPoBtVS had, I believe, a majority of women with a very significant male presence as well.
But it's only when I joined the Clamp's Tokyo Babylon/X's fandom in 2004 on Livejournal that I really found myself within female dominated fandoms. Fanfics as a fandom is extremely majorly made of women, I don't think men make more than 5% of it. In many ways the resulting dynamic rather surprised me. There's a lot I enjoyed from it. The welcome of feminist and queer-friendly values for one, and the warmth of people. No more dissing the female SF writers, or fantasy as a whole, or other ridiculous stuff.
There's also some things I disliked, such as the frowning upon any kind of disagreement/non positive comments, and all the things people sometime characterize as the "Cult of Nice". I'm not sure I'm so much more a fan of the Cult of Mean either, which is often horribly self-entitled, but I love debate, and I love getting helpful constructive criticism, and sometimes I'm being an ass in a discussion and I need someone to point it out to me politely (after which I can cool off then appologize). I also miss a bit of the obsessive mapping out details and powers and worldbuiling elements and stuff. Actually screw this, because people do it just as compulsively in female fandom, what I do miss is obsessive symbolical and thematic analysis which seems to catter to specific fandoms regardless of the gender makeover. What I do occasionnaly miss in female fandom is the way people don't seem to get the inherent kicking-ass awesomeness of ninja and pirates (unless talking of Jack Sparrow I s'pose) and Kung-Fu Jesus and heroin-pissing dinosaurs*
So when I get annoyed with that side of fanfic fandom and want a little bit of the other side I miss, I get back to lurking at, say, the RPG.net board, where I can see someone explaining his dilemna about one of his player telling him "No bitches at the table"
Insert visual of me face palming.
Lately it feels like I've seen more and more people talking in terms of fangirls and fanboys. The categories were new to me, but apparently they come with specific, different stereotypes where the fanboy is your everyday Dork and the fangirl squeals a lot about characters/actors being hotties. I've seen at least one person say she wouldn't like to identify as a fangirl but that it was okay for the fanboy because the stereotype had somewhat mellowed and become more hype and cool since big geeks like Joss Whedon, Kevin Smith and Tarantino started taking over Hollywood or something whereas the fangirl stereotype was still depraciated as hell which rather rejoined the whole point of the essay I mentionned at the start of this post.
But behind this I also get the impression that it's true to people. That women and men are whole different brands of fen, that they want something radically different from the text, that they play differently with the toys. That they don't fit in the same sandbox.
I'm not a fangirl. I'm certainly not a fanboy either. I'm a fan. Period.
I'm a fan who likes fanfics and roleplaying games, obsessive symbolical analysis, sociological meta, compulsive reviews of details and powers and worldbuilding stuff, and occasionnaly even fanart and fanvids and of course, the books/shows/texts too. It's all one for me.
It's not that I disaprove of what the essay talks about, about the whole fact that women said 'it's a big internet', took their stuff and the toys given by the text, and used them to play with it in their very own female space. I think that's really cool and proactive and awesome.
It's the fact that what I'd like to call my garden would be a place with equal parts of male and female point of views and welcome them all - just for the sake of diversity. (And gays, and non Americans, and gender queers, and Blacks, and people who don't have always a very correct syntax, and, and, and, too)
There's the question of whether it'd be even possible. If being just an even fraction of "regular" fandom would mean that the female part be co-opted and the female experience of fandom end up marginalized as it's once more 'All about the boy'.
I'd like to believe that it is. I've known places on the internet that were at least a little bit like this. That doesn't mean that they should not be female spaces as well...
But I'd really love to belong, myself, to a non-gendered fandom. I think that's the place where I'd be the more at ease.
Is that a bad thing to want?
* this is an obscure reference to the Role Playing Game Exalted which has canonically dinosaurs who eat Opium and pisses Heroin. It's a lucrative business. Exalted isalso an awesome game where homsexuality, gender queerness, bestiality, incest, and reincarnated magical bonds are all canon. It's a bit like the Harry Potter fandom of roleplaying games that way.
ETA: -- Spoilers for A Song of Ice and Fire - A Storm of Swords in the comments --
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Anyway, there's a lot of stuff on these discussions that made me angry as a woman against the systemicized sexism in fandom... but there's also something about the issue of gendered fandoms that really upsets me.
I've spent a majority of my "fandom life" within male dominated fandoms - first generalist Science Fiction newsgroup then Roleplaying Games clubs and forums. The kind of places where women make about 10 to 20% at most of the overall population. I've had to suffer to a lot of sexism, outright misogyny and sexual teasing. I went along with it because I wanted into the fandom and I didn't know anywhere else to get it and also because I'd been ostracized and bullied enough previously that the attention as the token girl and object of sexist and sexual jokes seemed actually an improvement.
Later on, I found some previously more mixed fandoms. ASOIAF has got, I think, about 40% of women at Ran's board. The part of Buffy's fandom I frequented, Masq's awesome ATPoBtVS had, I believe, a majority of women with a very significant male presence as well.
But it's only when I joined the Clamp's Tokyo Babylon/X's fandom in 2004 on Livejournal that I really found myself within female dominated fandoms. Fanfics as a fandom is extremely majorly made of women, I don't think men make more than 5% of it. In many ways the resulting dynamic rather surprised me. There's a lot I enjoyed from it. The welcome of feminist and queer-friendly values for one, and the warmth of people. No more dissing the female SF writers, or fantasy as a whole, or other ridiculous stuff.
There's also some things I disliked, such as the frowning upon any kind of disagreement/non positive comments, and all the things people sometime characterize as the "Cult of Nice". I'm not sure I'm so much more a fan of the Cult of Mean either, which is often horribly self-entitled, but I love debate, and I love getting helpful constructive criticism, and sometimes I'm being an ass in a discussion and I need someone to point it out to me politely (after which I can cool off then appologize). I also miss a bit of the obsessive mapping out details and powers and worldbuiling elements and stuff. Actually screw this, because people do it just as compulsively in female fandom, what I do miss is obsessive symbolical and thematic analysis which seems to catter to specific fandoms regardless of the gender makeover. What I do occasionnaly miss in female fandom is the way people don't seem to get the inherent kicking-ass awesomeness of ninja and pirates (unless talking of Jack Sparrow I s'pose) and Kung-Fu Jesus and heroin-pissing dinosaurs*
So when I get annoyed with that side of fanfic fandom and want a little bit of the other side I miss, I get back to lurking at, say, the RPG.net board, where I can see someone explaining his dilemna about one of his player telling him "No bitches at the table"
Insert visual of me face palming.
Lately it feels like I've seen more and more people talking in terms of fangirls and fanboys. The categories were new to me, but apparently they come with specific, different stereotypes where the fanboy is your everyday Dork and the fangirl squeals a lot about characters/actors being hotties. I've seen at least one person say she wouldn't like to identify as a fangirl but that it was okay for the fanboy because the stereotype had somewhat mellowed and become more hype and cool since big geeks like Joss Whedon, Kevin Smith and Tarantino started taking over Hollywood or something whereas the fangirl stereotype was still depraciated as hell which rather rejoined the whole point of the essay I mentionned at the start of this post.
But behind this I also get the impression that it's true to people. That women and men are whole different brands of fen, that they want something radically different from the text, that they play differently with the toys. That they don't fit in the same sandbox.
I'm not a fangirl. I'm certainly not a fanboy either. I'm a fan. Period.
I'm a fan who likes fanfics and roleplaying games, obsessive symbolical analysis, sociological meta, compulsive reviews of details and powers and worldbuilding stuff, and occasionnaly even fanart and fanvids and of course, the books/shows/texts too. It's all one for me.
It's not that I disaprove of what the essay talks about, about the whole fact that women said 'it's a big internet', took their stuff and the toys given by the text, and used them to play with it in their very own female space. I think that's really cool and proactive and awesome.
It's the fact that what I'd like to call my garden would be a place with equal parts of male and female point of views and welcome them all - just for the sake of diversity. (And gays, and non Americans, and gender queers, and Blacks, and people who don't have always a very correct syntax, and, and, and, too)
There's the question of whether it'd be even possible. If being just an even fraction of "regular" fandom would mean that the female part be co-opted and the female experience of fandom end up marginalized as it's once more 'All about the boy'.
I'd like to believe that it is. I've known places on the internet that were at least a little bit like this. That doesn't mean that they should not be female spaces as well...
But I'd really love to belong, myself, to a non-gendered fandom. I think that's the place where I'd be the more at ease.
Is that a bad thing to want?
* this is an obscure reference to the Role Playing Game Exalted which has canonically dinosaurs who eat Opium and pisses Heroin. It's a lucrative business. Exalted isalso an awesome game where homsexuality, gender queerness, bestiality, incest, and reincarnated magical bonds are all canon. It's a bit like the Harry Potter fandom of roleplaying games that way.
ETA: -- Spoilers for A Song of Ice and Fire - A Storm of Swords in the comments --
no subject
There's also subtle sexism such as scorn for shipping threads despite the ubiquity of "who's the best fighter" threads. I want balance. I want to be able to discuss who's the best fighter and who's in love with whom. After all, love and sex are the reasons for the wars in the series.
* The poster claims to be female but I don't want to believe that a woman would make such sickening statements. I also doubt that any woman would claim Sandor was less physically desirable than Tyrion.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
And I've seen "fanboy" used to mean the sort of fan who doesn't bathe, has no social skills, and opens conversations with total strangers by telling them what his character did last night--I complain sometimes about lacking social skills, but that stereotype's not me either.
I see myself as a geek, who obsesses about certain fandoms because I love the plots and the characters. I don't think I look at the texts differently from the way men do, but a few male fen I've met assume that I do.
And the same guys who think I only read HP for the hot men? They're the ones who have posters of babes in chainmail bikinis all over their walls...
Bah, I'm rambling, and not very coherently...
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I didn't realise that fandoms were gendered until last year, when I got my LJ. Hitherto, I'd only been in the Buffy fandom, which is just about as non-gendered as a fandom is going to get anytime soon, I think.
What stumps me is the need groups of fans (fang gangs) feel to destroy or chase away that which differs from their vision. I try to ride solo around the groups, but fandoms are not always comfortable place to be.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Anyway, I've wondered about why that is, since isn't it wrong to be pleased that it's mostly female? And now that I've thought about it, it probably wasn't that at all. The men who are in the fandom are treated just like anyone else, as they should be, and it'd be fine if there were more of them. It's the culture of these fandoms that's the difference. The reason I've been more comfortable in my current fandoms is mainly that they don't tend to attract people who hold certain values which can't fail to irritate me. For example, it's is very, very difficult to be a homophobe in the CLAMP fandom. And because of that, there don't tend to be, say, ardent right-wing fundamentalists. In some previous fandoms of mine there have been plenty of those sorts of people, and they were amazingly irritating. Plus, my current fandoms tend to attract older fans, who tend to be more coherent. Any men wandering into theses fandoms are likely to be people who are okay by me.
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
As for being a fangirl or fanboy or just fan, I think they're all separate things. Many girls I know are not fangirls, but are just fans. Same with guys/boys/whatever.
The "not saying anything to your face" is something I have a personal problem with, since I'm really unable to give much criticism to anyone over anything, and so I cannot say anything for or against.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
God no. But it's kind of revolutionary--the possibility of non-gendered fandom (it deserves italics, it's that awesome) had never even crossed my mind.
Thank you so much for this post. See icon for what you do x eleven zillion.
(no subject)
no subject
I do see us all as fans, who tend to express things in different ways, with this group over here tending to do X more than the other group I wonder if women write men out of their part of fandom because it makes life simpler; but personally I like the interaction and I value the difficult questions that it makes me ask myself about my interests.
I struggled with the responses on that blog because the writers are pretty hardline about their views. I can see why some people might see it that way, but yes, I'd prefer ungendered.
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
My brain mixes some very feminine traits with some very masculine ones, so I always feel out of place in groups which don't have a mix of both. I find the complex social hierachies and rules women build rather scary and incomprehensible, but I also can't stand the macho posturing and aggression a lot of men exhibit. Thus, depending on context, I identify with either men or women(*), but mostly with "people who work rather like I do", and such people can be found in both genders (and presumably in the continuum in between)
That said, the sexism inherent in our society means the situation is not symettrical. I have the advantage of being the right mix of nonthreatening, intelligent(**) and pretty-but-not-striking to be taken reasonably seriously but not seen as a threat/possible lay, I have seen other women have Serious Issues with men in fandom if they were seen as too aggressive or too ugly, or had to fight off lots of sleazes.
I get the impression a lot of female fans have had Very Bad experiences with entitlementy men online trying to take over or invalidate their girly spaces, so I can understand their defensiveness. I think the boys have as much or more of an "Us vs Them" attitude than the girls, but that doesn't mean I have to like it in either case. Especially when, as has already been stated, there is this tendency to go "fandom=women=fanfic=slash=porn" which is a little annoying as a gen-reading woman who is more involved in the non-fanfic parts of fandom.
On the other hand, there are things which really only seem to get discussed in female dominated spaces, either online or in subcliques of the larger multigendered fandom, and I have really enjoyed having my mind opened to things like feminist theory as I discover and engage with these spaces.
So I shall enjoy my ungendered discussions where I can get them and try to be open to the not-female voices in this branch of fandom, and speak up for the non-male POV in the others.
(*)That said, I am a woman and mostly take a fairly female-gendered-stance, if not always the one all the other women are taking
(**)I used to have men in fandom not take me seriously, but this happens a lot less since I got a Phd in maths :D
no subject
One thing that really bothers me is the continual use of gender stereotypes, describing this act as masculine and that as feminine. I would love if that language was completely rejected and we just talked about people as people and stopped trying to box them up and label them. (Not to mention, I will never understand how certain things can be male or female if a large number of people of both genders do them.)
no subject
I don't think that it's a bad thing to want a non-gendered fandom. I remember when I used to work at a tutoring center, I gave away flowers made of ribbon to the children there on my last day. When the head teacher saw them, she told me she didn't think the boys would want them. I offered them to the boys anyway. Two of them were happy enough to show them off to their parents when they were picked up. ^_^
But perhaps the whole idea of the gendered fandom goes back to childhood, with the whole idea of a "no-girls" boys' only clubhouse, or how girls are expected to play quietly while boys are more active, like in sports, etc. I think exclusivity makes people feel better about themselves in fandom - sort of like how "old" fans look down on "newbies." The gender divide might be something like that.
Of course, certain media are geared toward a certain audience. Things like shojo manga and anime are made for girls in mind. It's also interest though, that calling something "shojo" makes it automatically uncool for a male fan to proclaim himself as one. Perhaps in so-called gendered fandoms, there are a lot of fans of the opposite sex lurking around. I remember a post in one community dominated by women asking that fanboys show themselves, "we don't bite". XD And then the responses came.
As for "fanboy" and "fangirl," I always thought they were used in a joking way. I see no difference in being called a fanboy or fangirl. To me it just means being a very excitable fan who goes crazy over new releases, etc. I call myself a fangirl sometimes, not to bring out the fact that I'm a female, but to make fun of myself when I get starry-eyed over some new fandom thing. (Like someone posting up parts of the movie version of Tokyo Babylon with real actors on You Tube. *shock*) Society has tried to change gendered terms - firemen are now called firefighters, stewardesses are now called flight attendants. However, in some languages, gender is part of the structure. For example "la" and "el" in Spanish both serve as "the" but "la" is considered feminine and "el" is masculine. In Japanese, only girls call themselves "atashi" and get the "-chan" suffix (with a few exceptions).
I think it's hard to have a non-gendered fandom when gender in general seems very important in society. As it is, I'm a cynic. For example, while it's all nice and good to point out a first female politician, astronaut, etc, the fact that it's news just because the person is female (what are her other credentials?) makes it seem like gender is still very much in our minds. And young girls will want to find a woman in a field they want to excel in to take on as their role model. I remember in one interview, one Asian reporter said she felt she could only become one after seeing an female Asian newscaster on television as a child.
Whew. Okay, that's all I have to say. XD
no subject
I totally, utterly, completely agree with you! And I wish I had time to say more but I have to run off to a conference. :-/
no subject
So thank you!
no subject
Looking at the posts above there are obviously palces where it is true that tehre is an even mix of genders or where gender doesn't matter at all but taken overall there are definitely gender differences in fandom. I was at a Harry Potter con this weekend and which was something like 15% male... obviously that 15% was important and very much part of the community but it is a fact that overwhelmingly the online Harry Potter community (and specifically the LJ aprt of it) is rpedominantly female and that's something that can't be brushed away or ignored.
I've always found being online that it's itneresting to be able to speak to people before you know their gender, or race, or age etc. and perhaps we have to be careful we don't deliberately seperate female fans from male ones because obviously there is crossover but gender is an issue and it isn't going away.
So yes, good thing to want just not reality. Yet. *g*
no subject
I've been reading fanfics for over 10 years, and in the various places I've hung out... none of them had more women than men. In fact, they have very few women at all, and it don't think it's because we men looked down on them.
Of course, I don't actually hang out on LJ, I don't even use mine, so it may be different here...
(I've been trying to post this for ages but livejournal was all broken up)
There's a lot of food for thought here and I hope you don't mind if I link to this post as part of the rant/thought process.
(here via
(no subject)
Is that a bad thing to want?
I for myself, I am very happy in my mainly slash fandom, that is dominated by women. I don't that to change, but everyone is welcome to try to model their own fannish corner.
good luck:)