Pat from Pat's Fantasy Hotlist (yes, the same who called Priviledge of the Sword chick lit ^^), re-posted a bit of an interview he did of Hal Duncan (who wrote Vellum and Ink - I reviewed Vellum over there - ETA: Hal Duncan also has a blog which you can check out) which really cracked me up :
I see what he means about the first criticism (which one also finds in slash when people speak about "feminization" (sic) of characters), and I think the second exists in a few novels but not that many. I'm not sure I remember any instances of the third in genre fiction, but that may be because of the inherent blandness of such a character type. I actually think that there's a lot of interesting stories dealing with queer themes generally speaking in SFF but that's just IMHO.
It really amuses me when he says slash at least had the guts to get down and dirty ^_^ (I compared his work to specific kind of slash when I did my own review).
Thoughts?
Previous depictions of homosexual characters in fantasy/scifi books have always been somewhat clumsy and didn't ring true. And yet, instead of trying to get readers to "accept" it, you just went ahead and put Jack and Puck's relationship as a central storyline throughout both volumes. Was that intentional from the beginning? INK contains graphic sex scenes between the two, and I was wondering what sort of responses those sequences generated among readers and critics?
One of my pet hates is the fetishisation you get in certain types of fantasy, particularly vampire fiction, I have to say, where gay equals frilly shirts, sensitive pouts and lingering looks with doe-eyes. Man, at least slash is subversive in applying that aesthetic to straight characters, and at least slash has the guts to get down and dirty. That stuff is just softcore boy-on-boy goth porn. Even when it's not so deeply fetishised, there still seems to be a tendency to stereotype gays as refined rather than rough, fey rather than fiery, cats rather than dogs.
The second problem with gay characters in genre fiction is that they're generally marginalised as subsidiary characters, which smacks of PC tokenism. Yeah, so your heroine has a Gay Best Friend; big deal. So your team of heroes has a tagalong queer; I'm not impressed.
The last problem is that even when you get a fully-fledged protagonist they're generally just not genre enough. By which I mean, the writer feels the need to show that it's "normal" to be gay, so the characters are rendered in a Realist mode rather than as Romantic heroes. They're intelligent, sensitive portraits of gays as "just like everyone else". Bollocks to that. The fetishised gays are annoying. The marginalised gays are frustrating. But the normalised gays are just plain dull. I want a gay character who blows shit up. I want a gay James Bond, a gay Jerry Cornelius, a gay Superman, a gay Indiana Jones, a gay Clint Eastwood in Where Eagles Dare. Achilles wasn't normal. He was an uberfag, dragging Hector's body ten times round the gates of Troy for killing his boyfriend. Now that's what I call a hissy fit!
I see what he means about the first criticism (which one also finds in slash when people speak about "feminization" (sic) of characters), and I think the second exists in a few novels but not that many. I'm not sure I remember any instances of the third in genre fiction, but that may be because of the inherent blandness of such a character type. I actually think that there's a lot of interesting stories dealing with queer themes generally speaking in SFF but that's just IMHO.
It really amuses me when he says slash at least had the guts to get down and dirty ^_^ (I compared his work to specific kind of slash when I did my own review).
Thoughts?
no subject
Date: 27 December 2007 06:13 pm (UTC)Out of curiosity, is the author straight?
no subject
Date: 27 December 2007 06:16 pm (UTC)And he's about as straight as Clive Barker. He's got a blog as well, which you can check out : http://notesfromthegeekshow.blogspot.com/ I really liked his alphabet post.
no subject
Date: 27 December 2007 06:23 pm (UTC)Then again, it may be a cliche because of Anne Rice, whose male vamps were bi but leaned more toward same-sex attraction in the earlier novels. (She's het'ed them all up now, but that's another story.) And so it may be that current writers are borrowing an aesthetic for their straight characters that was originally applied to queer characters.
It's a really interesting post, and I'll be thinking more about it during lunch. :)
no subject
Date: 27 December 2007 06:32 pm (UTC)What about when a similar aestheticism is applied to non-vampire character? And then there's the manga outlook on the trope.
no subject
Date: 27 December 2007 06:38 pm (UTC)I would like to read about characters he presented in the third point, especially warrior type characters (like Achilles).
It seems now that I should read Vellum. ^_^
no subject
Date: 27 December 2007 06:42 pm (UTC)The only other uber-male gay character I can think of right now is Cnaiur in the Prince of Nothing trilogy. I mean, c'mon: Breaker of Men and Horses? I am sure one exists, but I sure can't remember the last time I read about a gay barbarian (especially one as deeply conflicted as Cnaiur is throughout the trilogy).
no subject
Date: 27 December 2007 06:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 27 December 2007 06:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 27 December 2007 06:49 pm (UTC)For the rest, I agree. Gay (or good lesbian) characters will not become mainstream or more varied in genre fiction.
Conphas, of course
Date: 27 December 2007 06:51 pm (UTC)exchange "Conphas" for "Proyas".
no subject
Date: 27 December 2007 06:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 27 December 2007 06:56 pm (UTC)Word! And is very annoying. And also affects other minority characters.
I have never read so much Vampire fiction, therefore I wouldn't know if there are more stories with the token gay best friend.
My impression of Vampire fiction is that it's the main character who's fabulously gay/bi. Oh, and in LKHamilton they're nominally bi, but don't actually get on because that freaks out LKH's sue. However I'm not an expert either.
I would like to read about characters he presented in the third point, especially warrior type characters (like Achilles).
Xray mentions Cnaiur bellow. I do adore this character although he's anything but nice. Richard St Vier from Kushner's Swordspoint is an expert duellist. There is GRRM's Dying of the Light, although that one could probably also be criticized. There's a few secondary character in Mary Gentle's Book of Ash who are very badass, and one very bad ass lesbian crossdressing field surgeon (not badass in the warrior sense, though)...
Vellum is a pretty fun book, especially if you love fucked up mythology and archetypes as much as I do ^_^
no subject
Date: 27 December 2007 06:57 pm (UTC)Wait, wait! Superman's not gay?!?
That's an awesome quote. I don't usually like the interviews Pat does.
no subject
Date: 27 December 2007 07:01 pm (UTC)Is SFF so lacking in gay writers? I mean, even if I look at the French field, it feels like there's a quite a few... I don't think the situation is as bad as it is for CoC, although I do think it could be very much better of course. And I totally need to read Monette soon.
Cnaiur... actually the problem with Cnaiur (though I adore him to pieces, and don't repeat that to anyone >_>;;) is that the extremely-macho-man and homophobe who is really a repressed homosexual is already a stereotype/archetype. It'd be nice to have a gloriously assumed gay character who also was the macho badass Duncan is describing.
no subject
Date: 27 December 2007 07:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 27 December 2007 07:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 27 December 2007 07:04 pm (UTC)And Clive Barker is also very, very gay. And writes gay sex in his novels. And is generally awesome.
no subject
Date: 27 December 2007 07:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 27 December 2007 07:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 27 December 2007 07:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 27 December 2007 07:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 27 December 2007 07:12 pm (UTC)I have this book "Hero" by Perry Moore about a gay superhero. I haven't read it yet though. But that quote made me think of it.
no subject
Date: 27 December 2007 07:15 pm (UTC)And a few of the Watchmen, although that was less central.
Although I'm very far from being an expert about comic books, I've heard of a few others.
no subject
Date: 27 December 2007 07:30 pm (UTC)I seem to have a lot of reading to catch up on.
And now I really want to read the Watchmen comics, over which I coincidentally stumbled yesterday while looking for something completely different.
no subject
Date: 27 December 2007 07:34 pm (UTC)Watchmen is absolutly fucking brillant and a must read, even though the gay characters I mention are rather peripheric to the main story (although one could make a case for Rorscharch as gay, but that's a topic for slash ^^)