Date: 28 July 2008 06:36 pm (UTC)
ext_2023: (drama)
but I do read as though those intentions are somehow manifest in the text and relevant.
Well, we are human being, as such our intelligence does tend to function with empathy, framing things as how people think. That's natural. I admit I also prefer Doyslian frames of interpretations than Watsonian ones that totally erase the idea that there were an author writing this things.

that a text could be read as the sum of the author's intentionality and unintentionality, and that both are significant.
For what objective? To judge the writer? Or to judge the work?

When I think about it, I approach intention in television shows differently than books, because TV shows seem more like the product of a collision of multiple "intentions"
Very true and one of the reason I prefer books to TV shows. I like having a feeling of consistent and coherent vision.

As for interpretation in fandom, I wonder if one additional reason -- beyond the ones that you list -- for why a particular interpretation might achieve a following in fandom regardless of accuracy is because it's especially productive in generating new stories, discussion, speculation?
Yes! Some interpretations are just more compelling in their complexity or narrative kinks appeal. Even if there's a simpler explanations, sometimes people do prefer the more complicated, stories & speculation producing theories. I've seen that in the Harry Potter fandom a lot (with a backlash that people often end up being disappointed by the real ending because it fails their expectations).
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19 202122232425
262728293031 

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
Page generated 4 Jul 2025 05:13 am

Style Credit