blahblahquizzdragonsbooksblah
24 Nov 2008 04:38 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
salineaSo, etrangere, your LiveJournal reveals...
You are... 3% unique (blame, for example, your interest in writers are liars mdear) and 13% herdlike (partly because you, like everyone else, enjoy writing). When it comes to friends you are a total whore. In terms of the way you relate to people, you are wary of trusting strangers. Your writing style (based on a recent public entry) is conventional.
Your overall weirdness is: 27
(The average level of weirdness is: 29.
You are weirder than 59% of other LJers.)
Find out what your weirdness level is!
The Blogalyser reveals...
Your blog/web page text has an overall readability index of 10.
This suggests that your writing style is simplistic
(to communicate well you should aim for a figure between 10 and 20).Your blog has 14 sentences per entry, which suggests your general message is distinguished by complexity
(writing for the web should be concise).
CHARACTER MATRIX
| male |   | female |
| self |    | world |
| past |    | future |
Your text shows characteristics which are 54% male and 46% female
(for more information see the Gender Genie).
Looking at pronoun indicators, you write mainly about yourself, then the world in general and finally your social circle. Also, your writing focuses primarily on the present, next the past and lastly the future.
Find out what your blogging style is like!
Yesterday I went to listen to story telling session at a tea shop, which was pretty nice. Then we went back to my home to watch more Utena (almost finished with it, now), but not before passing through local comic book shop where I bought too many comics.
Buffy S8 tome 3, aka the tome where Buffy sleeps with a girl as the whole internet had been very keen on telling me. Also a tome where Dracula comes back (awww destroyed my own theory on him) and is a pal of Xander, Dawn wrecks Tokyo along with her mecha look-a-alike (huhu... how subtle), and a couple of slayers of colour get killed. Not much to say. Witty dialogue is witty and kind of funny, albeit in a... I don't know. I guess it's too expected? Drama is null despite the deaths. There is no Faith.
Lattest Fables TPB "War in Pieces" which was decent but hardly riveting either, despite the fact I'm fond of Blue Boy. The best bits were Cinderella kicking ass in James Bond fashion, very amusing, especially with her commentary. The war part were pretty boring, very mechanical and without surprises. I hope that now that it's done we can get back to more interesting plot. Please?
I also broke down and got the Sworn Sword comic in hardcover since the paperback version didn't appear to be coming anytime soon. Or it's already out but local comic book shop refuses to cater it, or something. Haven't read it yet, though.
Also: 
the as yet ungendered None Shall Pass refuses to grow wings. All its nestmates already did, sadly all males - I was a bit hasty with my saying I was lucky so far on the gender balance front. Luckily this is easier to fix than the other way : guess I'll just pick up some pink and purple eggs next.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 24 November 2008 05:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 24 November 2008 05:45 pm (UTC)haha, I got me some unique interest for this express purpose really. But my writing style is simplistic, yet complex!
no subject
Date: 24 November 2008 06:03 pm (UTC)That must mean you are a fascinating enigma! :D
I've heard people on the forum say that the number of views a dragon gets (I forget if it was unique or total or both) influences its gender -- and I think they were saying that higher views predisposed towards males. Can't say I've seen that myself in any rigorous fashion, but it's true that my first two clutches, which were overwhelmingly female, had lower views than any subsequent ones. But I have no idea whether the theory is correct or not.
no subject
Date: 24 November 2008 06:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 24 November 2008 09:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 24 November 2008 10:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 24 November 2008 10:48 pm (UTC)