Date: 6 April 2012 06:16 pm (UTC)
hamsterwoman: (Default)
From: [personal profile] hamsterwoman
I also read about it on Bear's (matociquala's) LJ, before and after I read the book, so I think I was maybe more favorably disposed to it from the start?
How so?


I read her progress reports, so I knew a bit of what they were trying to do, deconstructing the animal companion fantasy, so I guess I approached it with that expectation, and I know from past stuff of hers I've read that Bear likes exploring gender roles, so I was on the lookout for that, too, and so the feminist themes probably felt more prominent to me because of that.

I don't think there's such a thing as "just part of the world [one] end[s] up in." There's no accident in writing.

Oh, yeah, I didn't mean that it was accidental in the writing -- it's definitely very intentional. I just wasn't sure what you meant by "transcend" (what it was applying to). I meant that the skeeviness wasn't meant to be transcended, IMO, that it was always meant to remain skeevy and problematic.

not only for the purpose of id scratching

I actually didn't get an id scratching vibe from the book at all (the opposite, if anything) -- in the sexy kinky way anyway. I could maybe see it in narrative kinky way, now that you mention that, but to me the gender roles stuff felt more prominent than even those aspects.

and that it could be easily squicky if those story elements are something one doesn't care for.

Oh, yes, it definitely deserves a warning for that!
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19 202122232425
262728293031 

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
Page generated 4 Jul 2025 08:56 pm

Style Credit