salinea: (Default)
[personal profile] salinea
20 Questions to a Better Relationship

eXpressive: 5/10
Practical: 3/10
Physical: 4/10
Giver: 3/10


You are a RSIT--Reserved Sentimental Intellectual Taker. This makes you a Archetypal Older Child.

You are a hard nut to crack. You have a wicked sense of humor. Despite your reserved nature, you are more comfortable (and successful) in the meeting and courting mode than you are in a long term relationship. You feel misunderstood, and usually you are.

When you're in a good mood, you're funny, fascinating and a sexy firecracker, but when you're in a bad mood you are moody, broody and impatient. In courtship mode, you don't have to let anyone see your moody side. If you had your way, even in a long term relationship you would have enough time apart to deal with your bad moods yourself; unfortunately, it rarely works that way.

You stifle *a lot* of anger and frustration -- from all areas of your life -- so when it comes out it comes out nasty. More than any other type, your conflicts tend to turn on one tiny thing -- the dishes, the laundry -- that's really a scapegoat for your larger dissatisfactions with your relationship. You're baffled that your partner just can't do the dishes -- your partner is baffled that it's such a big deal. The only way around it is to let the dishes go entirely and try to get at the real root of what's bothering you.

I'm making you sound like a bear, but the fact is that you're so warm and charming most of the time that it effectively offsets the times you're unhappy.

You will make a weirdly good parent.

Don't pair up with someone who'll make sexual demands of you. That's just not going to fly at all.

Of the 41992 people who have taken this quiz, 5.1 % are this type.


Wow, this is true in a scary way. (I didn't expect this quizz to get things so right from the question) Especially the good mood / bad mood. I can be charming - when I want to be. And when I don't want to, I have a hard time not to be a cranky bitch. Actually I've seldom been cranky bitchy in the few deep relationships I was for, btu I suppose with more experience I might get to it, eventually...

I got an XSIT.

Date: 2 September 2004 04:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] goldenh.livejournal.com
I think it fits pretty well, but the system has one huge flaw - I don't have, and never had, a SO.

Friends, yes, friends who wanted to be more, and could have been a SO? sure. Friends *I* wanted to be more with? oh yea, *so* been there.

But I've always kept that essential distance, either because the time wasn't right, or because it would have been too much work, or because, and this is the most common, they have the bad habit of moving away.

Re: I got an XSIT.

Date: 2 September 2004 05:41 pm (UTC)
ext_2023: (smile by starla_icons)
From: [identity profile] etrangere.livejournal.com
Yeah they said at the beginning they relied on us having experiences with that. Can't say I have met of my SOs' parents either actually XD but i had a couple of long-ish relationships.

Well, those things have to come at their own pacing, i'm sure you'll eventually find the right girl for you ^^

Re: I got an XSIT.

Date: 3 September 2004 07:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] darkemagick.livejournal.com
Pardon me for asking, but what's an SO?

Re: I got an XSIT.

Date: 4 September 2004 05:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] goldenh.livejournal.com
an SO is a Significant Other, the gender-blind version of boyfriend/girlfriend.

and thx for the support ete :)

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19 202122232425
262728293031 

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
Page generated 18 Jun 2025 06:48 pm

Style Credit