(no subject)
27 Dec 2007 11:55 pm1. I've got a throatache, hopefully getting better. Just the week when I was blissfully all by myself at home, meh.
2. Wrote two drabbles from the drabble request
Harry Potter
Aconite
Remus/MacNair
313 words
and
Tokyo Babylon
Sugar
Hokuto, Karen
120 words
3.
booklog_sff is now really kicking with the discussions starting about Curse of Chalion. Yay!
4. Something Positive holiday strips really, really amuse me. As we say in French, âmes sensibles s'abstenir, though.
2. Wrote two drabbles from the drabble request
Harry Potter
Aconite
Remus/MacNair
313 words
and
Tokyo Babylon
Sugar
Hokuto, Karen
120 words
3.
4. Something Positive holiday strips really, really amuse me. As we say in French, âmes sensibles s'abstenir, though.
Drabble
Date: 27 December 2007 11:45 pm (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drabble
Re: Drabble
Date: 27 December 2007 11:47 pm (UTC)Re: Drabble
Date: 27 December 2007 11:50 pm (UTC)Re: Drabble
Date: 27 December 2007 11:52 pm (UTC)Re: Drabble
Date: 28 December 2007 12:01 am (UTC)In the case of Drabble the use of the term for a specific Literary test and its definition in the rules of that contest make it a fixed an immutable definition.
(*) I also believe that whilst language evolves we should attempt to avoid explicitly erroneous usages becoming the accepted form.
Re: Drabble
Date: 28 December 2007 12:05 am (UTC)Nobody seems to be using ficlets anymore nowadays, I wonder why ^^
Do you know of any other good word for short forms?
Re: Drabble
Date: 28 December 2007 12:10 am (UTC)Drabble has been modified to Dribble for stories of exctly 5o words too. This defintion fails if the original is ignored.
Re: Drabble
Date: 28 December 2007 12:14 am (UTC)Short shorts just doesn't work given the context of fanfic (where 1,000 words is medium lengthed). I didn't know about dribble, I kept calling 50 words fics half-drabble.
Re: Drabble
Date: 28 December 2007 12:18 am (UTC)Maybe if you can explain it email me....
Re: Drabble
Date: 28 December 2007 12:33 am (UTC)And using other characters and other settings can be just as "original" as original fics. Think of it as collage. It's not because one uses material which belonged to previous works that the final work isn't new or worthy in itself.
It's an appropriation of a ubiquitously broadcasted material by people instead of being simple readers/buyers, and thus a subversion. It takes place out of the frame that work of arts are sold and bought, but instead are exchanged by friends. And it's an appropriation which often has a context of a less sexist, heteronormative reading of the text (the SFF genre isn't yet the most welcoming to women, despite the fact that they're the biggest readers of fantasy). It's folktales. People taking a story and re-telling them, and re-telling them.
There's a bunch of ways to analyze fanfics and to see it's got worth, both as a creative work and as a cultural community.
no subject
Date: 28 December 2007 07:45 am (UTC)http://www.trickster.org/symposium/symp162.html
Even there the author indicates it's mainly defined by the fandom and fen you're writing for.
-Yeah I finally got over my cold a few days ago and just when I find out I have my nephew for the week, I develop another cough. >_> Dontcha love how that always happens? XD
no subject
Date: 28 December 2007 01:53 pm (UTC)arghness for cold.
no subject
Date: 28 December 2007 09:18 am (UTC)And I liked both stories.. regardless of whether they are technically drabbles or not.
no subject
Date: 28 December 2007 01:55 pm (UTC)Yeah, I can't find myself caring much about the name ^^
no subject
Date: 28 December 2007 09:52 am (UTC)I hope you are feeling better soon. And, yay, for a little creativity push. ^^
no subject
Date: 28 December 2007 01:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 28 December 2007 03:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 28 December 2007 03:58 pm (UTC)Hihi, stranger things have happened ^^