It's time for books read recently!
23 Jun 2008 10:35 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Yeap! I've been reading books again! yay! Sadly my fanfics reading suffered from it *looks sadly at the fanfic pile TBR* *cough* so
Moon Called, Blood Bound, Iron Kissed by Patricia Briggs
Recced to me by
ontogenesis it's a trilogy of what's called "paranormal romance" centering around the character Mercy, a mechanic half-native girl who happens to be a Walker - she can changes into a coyote - her Werewolf adoptive family, her friend the vampire, her former boss the fae - and the supernatural crime stories she finds herself involved into. Okay, I made this sound extremely cheesy, it's actually very decently written in tone, style and characterization, and the plots are quite clever as well (except for the first novel which did have a clever plot but the resolution of which was silly and very artificial). It is, however, awfully cookie cutter in terms of world building and suffers too much of WoD-ism (I mean, in three books and you get werewolves, vampires, nuwisha walkers, fae, ghosts and demons. No mummies or prometheans yet, maybe that's for te next book :p oh, and apparently finding humans is a hard task in this small town despite the fact that turning people into the various critters isn't very easy to do). While - like in the Anita Blake books - I liked the fact that some of the supernatural creatures were "out" in the eye of the public, I found there were sadly too little made of that. The lack of original world building is made up by the solid craftsmanship of the writing, and by the fact the character are well rounded and sympathetic. I especially liked how the main character is hardly very powerful, she has a few tricks, and thinking how to use these tricks smartly was the good way to solve the intrigues. I liked that the third book lampshaded, if not subverted, the exploitative nature of the main character's native identity which is used as an excuse for her powers but not much else. The romance subplot I could take or leave it - someday I need to figure out how come I can devour shoujo manga and fanfics and love shipping in other books and whereas books mean as romance leave me perfectly cold... Hitting on the wrong kinks I guess.
I, Claudius by Robert Graves
I'd seen the title come up quite a few time as Historical novel worth reading, and since I wanted to read more historical books I jumped on the occasion at my latest book store visit. When I picked it up I couldn't really put it down until the end. The life of Claudius, grandson of Augustus, nephew of Tiberius, uncle of Caligula and finally emperor himself, through a very troubled time of the Roman empire which he survives to mainly because he's the stammering, crippled boy everyone takes for a fool. The writing is delightful and very fluid, the events told are fascinating, baroque, intricate and often grimly amusing. The voice of Claudius in particular is excellent, although oddly not very likeable. I found myself often suspicious of how reliable a narrator he is, which actually works extremely well with the framing device when another style would have broken my suspension of disbelief. My main gripe right now is I don't have the sequel in my hand yet.
Acacia by David Anthony Durham
Acacia has been the ruling Empire of all the Known World for countless year. However, the northern people of the Mien have decided to strike a decisive blow against them. The current King plans, for their protection, to send his four children away in hiding. But do not the Mien rebel for some good reasons?
Acacia's a pretty good story, in fact by the point I reached the last page, I'm ready to say it's a really good story. Sadly, I didn't find the way it was told to my liking. Mainly it suffered for much too much "tell don't show". I'm not one to usually complain about this, I think sometimes telling rather than showing is the adequate style for the story, but in this case all too often I found it was robbing me of the dramatic or emotional moments that were being set up and that I was looking forward to see - very frustrating. Chapters cut right before those moments and when the action shifted back to it the moment was long past. The free indirect speech was overused. Characterization was told through short snippets of unlikely self-clarity instead of felt through the people's actions and inner narrative. Important turning points happened off-screen. Arguably that was necessary to fit all of the story in one volume which at almost 700 pages is already pretty big, and which after all is only the first of a series. Then again, I also felt the whole first part (9 years from the second) could have worked as a prologue; and there are many asides and rambles which could have been trimmed to focus on more important things.
I'm being negative, but, as I said, the story is actually very good. Loved the sense of melancholy and the theme of idealism vs realpolitik complexities of the story. in many ways it reminded me of Guy Gavriel Kay's stories (Tigana in particular shares many themes with Acacia) but with a less annoying style (although Durham did use a "later he would look back to this moment" turn of phrases a few times too many :)). I really liked most of the characters, who are very nuanced and obviously well designed even if I didn't like how their characterization was felt through. It's not all that easy to make royal kids interesting and I thought it was a success. Thaddeus was also pretty interesting and so were the two Mien characters. Otherwise, most characters were too little developed IMO, and the fact the only significant female characters were the two royal sisters was also oddly felt. In this line also, while I really loved Corinn and found her the most interesting of the character, I still find myself troubled by the gender dynamic around her characters and am somewhat afraid about how that'll turn up in the rest of the series. I occasionally found the world building a bit odd, in the sense that I did not know if this was a world with little magic or a work of high fantasy, and some of the most magical elements really didn't work for me, didn't feel inherent to the settings despite the heavy part they played in the intrigue. It felt like they were out of another novel, there just to provide the necessary deus ex machina.
In conclusion a great story, with some annoying idiosyncrasies. I'll definitely keep on reading, but I'm quite wary as well.
Moon Called, Blood Bound, Iron Kissed by Patricia Briggs
Recced to me by
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I, Claudius by Robert Graves
I'd seen the title come up quite a few time as Historical novel worth reading, and since I wanted to read more historical books I jumped on the occasion at my latest book store visit. When I picked it up I couldn't really put it down until the end. The life of Claudius, grandson of Augustus, nephew of Tiberius, uncle of Caligula and finally emperor himself, through a very troubled time of the Roman empire which he survives to mainly because he's the stammering, crippled boy everyone takes for a fool. The writing is delightful and very fluid, the events told are fascinating, baroque, intricate and often grimly amusing. The voice of Claudius in particular is excellent, although oddly not very likeable. I found myself often suspicious of how reliable a narrator he is, which actually works extremely well with the framing device when another style would have broken my suspension of disbelief. My main gripe right now is I don't have the sequel in my hand yet.
Acacia by David Anthony Durham
Acacia has been the ruling Empire of all the Known World for countless year. However, the northern people of the Mien have decided to strike a decisive blow against them. The current King plans, for their protection, to send his four children away in hiding. But do not the Mien rebel for some good reasons?
Acacia's a pretty good story, in fact by the point I reached the last page, I'm ready to say it's a really good story. Sadly, I didn't find the way it was told to my liking. Mainly it suffered for much too much "tell don't show". I'm not one to usually complain about this, I think sometimes telling rather than showing is the adequate style for the story, but in this case all too often I found it was robbing me of the dramatic or emotional moments that were being set up and that I was looking forward to see - very frustrating. Chapters cut right before those moments and when the action shifted back to it the moment was long past. The free indirect speech was overused. Characterization was told through short snippets of unlikely self-clarity instead of felt through the people's actions and inner narrative. Important turning points happened off-screen. Arguably that was necessary to fit all of the story in one volume which at almost 700 pages is already pretty big, and which after all is only the first of a series. Then again, I also felt the whole first part (9 years from the second) could have worked as a prologue; and there are many asides and rambles which could have been trimmed to focus on more important things.
I'm being negative, but, as I said, the story is actually very good. Loved the sense of melancholy and the theme of idealism vs realpolitik complexities of the story. in many ways it reminded me of Guy Gavriel Kay's stories (Tigana in particular shares many themes with Acacia) but with a less annoying style (although Durham did use a "later he would look back to this moment" turn of phrases a few times too many :)). I really liked most of the characters, who are very nuanced and obviously well designed even if I didn't like how their characterization was felt through. It's not all that easy to make royal kids interesting and I thought it was a success. Thaddeus was also pretty interesting and so were the two Mien characters. Otherwise, most characters were too little developed IMO, and the fact the only significant female characters were the two royal sisters was also oddly felt. In this line also, while I really loved Corinn and found her the most interesting of the character, I still find myself troubled by the gender dynamic around her characters and am somewhat afraid about how that'll turn up in the rest of the series. I occasionally found the world building a bit odd, in the sense that I did not know if this was a world with little magic or a work of high fantasy, and some of the most magical elements really didn't work for me, didn't feel inherent to the settings despite the heavy part they played in the intrigue. It felt like they were out of another novel, there just to provide the necessary deus ex machina.
In conclusion a great story, with some annoying idiosyncrasies. I'll definitely keep on reading, but I'm quite wary as well.
no subject
Date: 23 June 2008 09:35 pm (UTC)Is the Patricia Briggs series the one with the rape subplot in the third book? I think I remember being intrigued by the books, but held off buying them after someone on LJ gave the third one a scathing review because of that problem.
no subject
Date: 23 June 2008 11:46 pm (UTC)Yes, the Patricia Briggs series is that one. I thought the rape was relatively well handled. I mean there's a rape, but I've seen this used as a plot device in infinitely worse ways. I don't think having a rape subplot is a problem as such? Unless it's a squick/trigger/peeve.
no subject
Date: 24 June 2008 12:18 am (UTC)But if you think it was well-handled, I might give them a try! Though I'll probably grab them from the library for a trial run first.
no subject
Date: 24 June 2008 10:01 am (UTC)Do you have a link to the review still?
no subject
Date: 24 June 2008 12:26 pm (UTC)The reviewer liked the first two books a lot, though, which perhaps is why she reacted so strongly to a subplot she really hated showing up in the third? It's always more annoying when a series you really liked goes off the rails for you, as opposed to one that you were just "meh" about.
no subject
Date: 24 June 2008 12:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 23 June 2008 09:40 pm (UTC)... You didn't like Tigana?
no subject
Date: 23 June 2008 11:42 pm (UTC)See what
no subject
Date: 23 June 2008 11:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 24 June 2008 10:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 24 June 2008 01:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 23 June 2008 10:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 23 June 2008 11:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 24 June 2008 12:44 am (UTC)Still getting through The Yiddish Policemen's Union, which is great except I need to stop every other page to look up Jewish terminology and slang on teh Internet (only to find some of it is the author's own invention). Good book though, but not sure if it deserves winning both the Nebula and the Locus.
no subject
Date: 24 June 2008 10:00 am (UTC)The Yiddish Policemen's Union is definitly on my to buy list, but now you make me scared with the Jewish terminology. Well, Yiddish at least. I know no Yiddish. I don't even think my Ashkenasi Grandparents talked Yiddish... >_>; then again, can it be worse than River of Gods (which I highly rec in case you haven't read it)? Which did have lexicon though.
no subject
Date: 26 June 2008 05:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 28 June 2008 01:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 24 June 2008 07:59 am (UTC)*puts I, Claudius on reading pile*
no subject
Date: 24 June 2008 09:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 25 June 2008 01:26 am (UTC)It's excellent, and very cleverly written to boot.
no subject
Date: 25 June 2008 09:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 26 June 2008 11:21 am (UTC)That's what I like too. I'm glad you gave it a shot. And I don't quite care for the romance either (except for the gay couple, actually. ^^;; ).
no subject
Date: 28 June 2008 01:03 am (UTC)Hmm, I think I could take or leave the gay couple as well. I mean, they were good characters as such, but there was nothing particularly interesting in their romance and they kinda highlighted the fact Merry had no female friends because girls have cooties and stuff :(
no subject
Date: 27 June 2008 07:25 pm (UTC)and quote me as agreeing totally about the Patricia Briggs series ( also a recent read), nice but somehow, dunno, perhaps the best way to compare it would be to clothes trends. For some reason the "urban fantasy" which is really popular like now, seems to have this set of rules up to romantic involvement, and the Mercy Thompson series seems very much a part of that trend. And it´s been so trendy it´s now tiring, a bit like my reaction to "pregnant" smock tops which keep showing in shops, just stop and put waists where they should be!
Graves´Claudius books I read on my own at a probably very inappropriate age (10 or so), I wanted more Roman books and those were around in a attic. Even at that age ( and I missed a lot of the details, incest and all), I loved those, so full of history and stories at the same time. I tried reading other books of his, but nothing really clicked for me. And after Graves, if you not already, you got to try Mary Renault of course :)
no subject
Date: 28 June 2008 01:06 am (UTC)hahaha, yeah it is awfully trendy and her books were very formulaic. Well made, so they still read with pleasure, but it's disapointing to see so very little originality.
Mary Renault is a name I keep seeing, yes. I looked for it at my local bookstore but they told me they didn't buy it anymore, too difficult to sell :( I need to order for specific titles. Any book in particular you would advice me?
no subject
Date: 29 June 2008 10:46 am (UTC)I am going to check hamsterwoman´s opinion now!
About Mary Renault, not sell, oh honestly! Makes you want to cry, thinking of all those historical books "for women" with pretty pretty covers (I got to reconcile feminism with my feelings for most of these books which seem directed at women). Her most famous books are probably the Alexander Trilogy : Fire from Heaven, The Persian Boy and Funeral Games; I think you would truly like those. My personal favorite ( and I still got a few to read, luckily) is probably Last of the Wine.
no subject
Date: 29 June 2008 01:05 pm (UTC)