Thought inducing post linked from my flist by a few people, if you've missed it: I didn't dream of dragons by
deepad
It is causing me quite a bit of discomfort because it is hitting some right spot.
Also I've been wondering if my username was perhaps horribly presumptuous and if I should change it >_>;
ETA: actually I should just rec this list of links collected by
rydra_wong
It is causing me quite a bit of discomfort because it is hitting some right spot.
Also I've been wondering if my username was perhaps horribly presumptuous and if I should change it >_>;
ETA: actually I should just rec this list of links collected by
no subject
Date: 14 January 2009 09:11 pm (UTC)From one of the other links, when I heard about the AVATAR movie cast I got quite annoyed at how predictably white-centric it was. I would have expected an Indian director to have at least stood up to the studio on this point but evidently not.
no subject
Date: 14 January 2009 09:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 14 January 2009 10:58 pm (UTC)Disappointing :-(
no subject
Date: 15 January 2009 07:17 am (UTC)Making the Asian characters white was bad enough, but if you were really blind you could argue that it's the same basic skin tone, and it's hard to definitively make out facial features. If you just showed someone who had never seen Avatar a picture of Aang in culturally-neutral clothes and asked them his race, they might not be able to say for sure if he was white or Asian, because the art is so stylized. (I see him as Asian because I'm used to the anime style, but still.) But Katara and Sokka? How do you miss BROWN?
Regarding cultural appropriation, I understand it's an issue and needs talking about and awareness of, but I also think that many writers deliberately choose "the other" to write about in order to better understand it. They say "write what you know," but that's boring. By writing about other cultures, you live a little through their eyes, at least, to the ability of your imagination. While I'm sure they get things wrong and it might be weird to read it from the perspective of someone from that culture, isn't trying to understand a step in the right direction?
The problem, IMO, is when the author /doesn't/ try to understand, s/he just writes the two-dimensional stereotype and leaves it at that. But say, something like Avatar, where Mike and Bryan, two totally white dudes, write this whole Asian fantasy world, while avoiding any specific culture so as to avoid appropriating too much, that was pretty cool, yes? (I do have a problem with how some of the philosophy and attitudes are just so /Western/, but then it'll do something really Eastern and cool and I'll just think of it as a platypus-bear, a mix of two things that makes an even cooler thing.)
no subject
Date: 15 January 2009 12:50 pm (UTC)Hmm. That makes sense.
If you just showed someone who had never seen Avatar a picture of Aang in culturally-neutral clothes and asked them his race, they might not be able to say for sure if he was white or Asian, because the art is so stylized.
But Aang is never in culturally-neutral clothes! (actually, what are culturally-neutral clothes? Nakedness?)
But Katara and Sokka? How do you miss BROWN?
Yeah, I think both kinds of whitewashing are disturbing, and highlight disturbing things about societies. This one is more flagrant though.
While I'm sure they get things wrong and it might be weird to read it from the perspective of someone from that culture, isn't trying to understand a step in the right direction?
No, mostly I agree with you. But because there's a long story of cultural and artistic appropriation that was exploitative, people need to be careful and critical.
I agree with you, I think Avatar was really well done and a good example about how to write about different cultures than your own without being exploitative.
no subject
Date: 14 January 2009 11:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 14 January 2009 11:37 pm (UTC)I'm not sure I agree with everything either, but I found it very compelling.
I think we are still overall trying to learn how to deal with the scars of colonialism and imperialism. It's a very tough process, and I always felt, regarding the part of my origins that are related to it, that there were a lot of unspeakable things and unsaid things; and things which are too difficult or painful to articulate. There's a feeling of being exiled, but also that I can never again claim this part of culture as mine, and that feels painful to me.
no subject
Date: 15 January 2009 03:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 15 January 2009 03:22 am (UTC)Why would your username be presumptuous?
no subject
Date: 15 January 2009 12:31 pm (UTC)I've been thinking about the way I relate with the category of Other, largely and for various reasons I identify with it, for various reasons. I think many geeks do. And it's a large part of why I chose this username.
Then I was thinking about that exchange between
no subject
Date: 15 January 2009 01:03 pm (UTC)The existence of other, more socially powerful types of "Othering" doesn't negate the "Othering" you might feel, and I don't see why it means you shouldn't express that feeling. It would just be impolite and unhelpful to bring up that feeling in the middle of a discussion about some other type of "Othering."
no subject
Date: 15 January 2009 01:11 pm (UTC)Aah. Good point. Thank you for your thoughtful answer.
no subject
Date: 15 January 2009 06:57 am (UTC)REading many of those posts raise so many questions about how to define me and how to define the many things that annoy me about my fandom experience.
Because, on one hand, I'm a white middle-class Christian, with a college education even and that's a lot of privilege. On the other hand, I live in a Third World Country, whose cultural identity has been completely fucked-up because, as I was telling you the other day, it's not like we're anything other than a bunch of wannabe Parisians. Well, there's this huge area of Argentinian culture that's not European, but that's not mine and I'd be appropriating quite a bit if I were to, say, use Guaraní mythology in a story. So I relate to many of the things they say, but I don't feel comfortable identifying either.
But, still, my position isn't quite the same as an American or a Western European. It's like I can't be French or British, but I can't be anything else either.
/ends self-involved thoughts
no subject
Date: 15 January 2009 12:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 15 January 2009 06:44 pm (UTC)and now I'm thinking why I feel so uncomfortable in both spaces and I think it's because, in Argentinian context, I'm not the Other. TV is about me and books are about me and politics are about me and newspaper talk to me. There's this... huge side of Argentina I'm not a part of, well, maybe a little but not as much as many other Argentinians who are the Other to me. Their experience is not part of what we think is 'Argentina'.
But when I get into a... global space, like the Internet, and suddenly TV and newspaper are not about me anymore and I start to feel like the Other.
And sorry about blabbering. :S
no subject
Date: 15 January 2009 10:20 am (UTC)As for the situation that sparked this essay, Sarah Monette (the author of Mélusine) also has a post on her LJ with some insights - here.
Also, I don't think your username is presumptuous. You don't need an outside blessing for how you feel (if that's the reason you chose it).
no subject
Date: 15 January 2009 12:46 pm (UTC)Yeah! I feel like that too, and like I want to find those stories too, learn about them even if I can't ever quite understand them, because they're usually so much drowned out by the more dominant stories.
Thanks for the other links!
You don't need an outside blessing for how you feel (if that's the reason you chose it).
That's a good point. Thank you ^^